The Play Research Group, UWE, Bristol
studying the technologies and cultures of games and play
Mo'nonymous on Gaming Horoscope
sethgiddings on '... I have studied...
urbnomad on Hello Kitty Online
urbnomad on Pinky analog pixel a...
Playful Subjects
more about this weblog...
Play Research Group - old page
1up
antimodal
avant game
avant gaming
buzzcut
culture clash
cyberzel's mind
Dave Surman
digiplay initiative
digital girls
digra
educational games research
eludamos
frans goes blog
gamasutra
game code
game research
game studies
game+girl=advance
gameblogs.org
gameology
games and culture
games*design*art*culture
gender & culture
got game?
grandtextauto
grrlgamer
guardian games blog
intelligent artifice
jill/txt
Jonas Heide Smith
joystick.101
ludologica
ludology.org
ludonauts
memorycard
miscellany...
notebook
playability.de
popularculturegaming
reality panic
Sara Mosberg Iversen
selectparks
shinyspinning.com
technophilia
terra incognita
terra nova
the escapist
the ludologist
thinking with my fingers
uwe
videogame visionary
watercoolergames
women gamers
zang.org
zone of influence
today
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
August 2004
July 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
Reported by Gamespot, "industry icons" are giving us their views on the future market of online gaming. Here is Raph Koster - leading fun theorist:
"The entire video game industry's history thus far has been an aberration," Koster told the audience. "It has been a mutant monster only made possible by unconnected computers. People always play games together. All of you learned to play games with each other. When you were kids, you played tag, tea parties, cops and robbers, what have you. The single-player game is a strange mutant monster which has only existed for 21 years and is about to go away because it is unnatural and abnormal."
Now, even considered as (so-called 'provocative') marketing speach, this is a puzzling statement. I mean, everything makes a lot of sense up until those last 12 words, but from there on our market analyst seems to sort of flip out, taking the 'industry veteran' thing almost into parody. I understand that the online market is very important to the executives (especially on consoles), and that it would be nice to hook us all up directly so that they can get rid of retail, piracy, used games market etc. But 'abnormal'? Singleplayer gaming is indeed a cultural bastard in the history of games and play, and as most 'mutant monsters', it is quite an interesting and stimulating one. But in what sense exactly has the development of computer games over the last twenty years been 'unnatural'? And why should it go away? I don't know, maybe it takes a veteran to understand a veteran.

http://www.persuasivegames.com/games/game.aspx?game=disaffected